Lessons from the 2021 audit of complaints procedures
Fair and transparent complaints procedures give Costs Lawyers’ clients justified confidence that any complaints will be handled appropriately.
To improve the quality of Costs Lawyers’ complaints procedures, the CLSB carries out an annual audit as part of its wider supervision programme.
The Costs Lawyer Handbook contains a Guidance Note intended to help Costs Lawyers produce an effective procedure for handling first-tier complaints. The guidance details requirements for a complaints procedure, and those requirements form the basis of the audit. The guidance also contains a model complaints procedure that Costs Lawyers can adapt for their own use.
This page highlights some common mistakes that were spotted in the 2021 audit.
1. Providing out of date contact details
Complaints procedures must include contact details for both the Legal Ombudsman and CLSB. Not one of the 20 procedures we audited had correct contact details for both the Legal Ombudsman and CLSB! Make sure your procedure contains the latest information.
2. Missing information
As well as not providing the correct contact details, the majority of procedures we audited failed to advise complainants of an approved alternative dispute resolution body. They also failed to encourage complaints to be made as soon as possible and set out the time limits for raising unresolved complaints with CLSB and the Legal Ombudsman.
Only 2 of the 20 audited stated the date they were effective or updated. And one of these was over 10 years ago!
Only 5 of the 20 audited provided correct information on what the complainant should do if they are not satisfied with the outcome, and only 7 of the 20 gave timescales for resolving complaints.
3. Mixing up CLSB & ACL
The CLSB has been the regulator of Costs Lawyers since 2011. The Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) is the profession’s representative body, and does not play any role in dealing with complaints.
The CLSB is the organisation that needs to be named in the complaints procedure, so that clients know where to turn if they want to escalate a complaint. During the audit, we found several confusing references to clients having a right to complain to ACL (which they don’t).
More information about the difference between the CLSB and ACL can be found on the Who We Are page of our website.
4. Using out of date guidance
Guidance Notes are regularly reviewed and updated when necessary. Many of the complaints procedures we audited had not been updated for many years and were therefore not in line with the current Guidance.
5. Using the guidance as a complaints procedure
One of the procedures we audited had reproduced the text of an out of date Guidance Note almost in its entirety. This meant the procedure did not explain how the Costs Lawyer’s own complaints process worked and was not drafted in a clear an accessible way.
A model complaints procedure is included in the current Guidance Note. You can use this as the basis for updating your own complaints procedure, adapting it as appropriate for your particularly circumstances.
Getting your complaints procedure ready for audit
All of the revised complaints procedures submitted to us so far following the 2021 audit have used our model complaints procedure either mainly or wholly. There is no requirement to use this, but if you do then you can take comfort that your procedure will be compliant. As the guidance changes in future we will update the model procedure if necessary.
You might also like to see the Spotlight article on good complaint handling from our June 2021 newsletter by Steve Pearson, Deputy Chief Ombudsman at the Legal Ombudsman.
We will undertake a further audit of complaints procedures in 2022 – make sure yours is ready!