Disciplinary outcomes

When are disciplinary sanctions imposed?

Regulated Costs Lawyers are required to uphold principles of professional conduct and comply with regulatory rules. These rules can be found in the Costs Lawyer Handbook, which includes the Costs Lawyer Code of Conduct.

If CLSB receives information suggesting that a Costs Lawyer’s conduct has fallen below the expected standard, we will carry out an investigation. If, following that investigation, we find that a Costs Lawyer has breached the rules, a disciplinary sanction can be imposed.

Some cases require further consideration. These include particularly complex cases, cases involving serious breaches and contentious cases where a Costs Lawyer doesn’t agree with the outcome of the investigation. These cases will be considered by a CLSB Conduct Committee or Conduct Appeal Committee. The Committees are appointed in accordance with our Panel Member Appointment Policy and Code of Conduct.

What disciplinary sanctions are available to the CLSB?

Disciplinary sanctions that can be imposed for a breach of our rules include:

  • A warning letter, describing conduct that the Costs Lawyer must cease or not repeat in future
  • A written undertaking, setting out how the Costs Lawyer agrees to behave going forward
  • Suspension or revocation of the Costs Lawyer’s practising certificate (including on an interim basis)
  • Imposition of conditions on the Costs Lawyer’s practising certificate
  • A financial penalty

Costs Lawyers who are found to have breached the rules must also pay a contribution toward the CLSB’s costs of dealing with the case. This is intended to ensure that compliant practitioners don’t bear the whole financial burden of non-compliance by others.

A Costs Lawyer whose conduct breaches the rules of another regulator will be reported to that regulator. Unlawful behaviour can also be reported to the police.

What is the process for imposing disciplinary sanctions?

The process for considering whether a Costs Lawyer’s conduct breaches our rules and for imposing disciplinary sanctions can be found in our Disciplinary Rules and Procedures.

Our Policy statement on enforcement and sanctions provides further information about our enforcement priorities, as well as mitigating and aggravating factors that we will take into account in deciding what sanctions to impose. Our Disciplinary Rules and Procedures reasonable adjustments policy ensures that disciplinary processes are fair and accessible to all involved.

The legal regulators, including the CLSB, have also committed to tackling counter-inclusive misconduct through their disciplinary processes.

How do I know if there is a disciplinary outcome against a Costs Lawyer?

If we find that a Costs Lawyer has breached our rules, the disciplinary outcome will usually be published. The published disciplinary outcome will include the nature of the breach as well as the disciplinary sanction (or sanctions) imposed.

The fact that there has been a disciplinary outcome will be noted against the Costs Lawyer’s name on the Register of Costs Lawyers, under the field “conditions on practising”. A further description of the disciplinary outcome will appear on this webpage under the heading below.

Publication is made in accordance with our Policy statement on publication of disciplinary decisions.

Record of disciplinary sanctions

Two disciplinary outcomes to date:

 

Summary of complaint received The Costs Lawyer did not maintain professional indemnity insurance in breach of the Code of Conduct.
Summary of outcome The Costs Lawyer admitted the allegation that he did not maintain professional indemnity insurance for a period in 2025 and was found to be in breach of the following Principle:

  • Principle 3.8: You must ensure that you maintain professional indemnity insurance that complies with the Practising Rules and promptly provide evidence of that insurance cover if requested by a client, CLSB or the Legal Ombudsman.

Allegations into Principle 1 were not proved by the investigation.

The Costs Lawyer provided a written undertaking to the CLSB:

  • To comply with Principle 3.8 Code of Conduct by ensuring that he maintains professional indemnity insurance that complies with the Practising Rules and promptly provide evidence of that insurance cover if requested by a client, CLSB or the Legal Ombudsman.
  • To keep in place efficient and effective systems in his professional practice to remind him of important renewal dates including, but not limited to, renewal of PII and renewal of my practising certificate.
  • To endorse each of his current files to the effect that between 18 May 2025 and 1 December 2025 no work was undertaken upon it.

In addition, the Costs Lawyer received a fixed costs order of £500.

Costs Lawyer Oliver Jones (CL687)
Date 24 February 2026
Summary of complaint received The Costs Lawyer may have breached Principles of the Costs Lawyer Code of Conduct.
Summary of outcome The investigation proved the allegation that the Costs Lawyer breached the following Principles:

  • Principle 1: Act with honesty and integrity and maintain your independence (in relation to integrity only).
  • Principle 6: Treat everyone fairly and equitably, and with dignity and respect.

Allegations into Principle 2, Principle 4 and Principle 7 were not proven by the investigation.

The Costs Lawyer provided a written undertaking to the CLSB that:

  • He shall at all times act in accordance with the Code of Conduct and particularly not forge the signature of others or take his employer’s intellectual property but act with honesty and integrity at all times.
  • He will treat everyone fairly and equitable and with dignity and respect, particularly avoiding language which others may reasonably consider to be racist, homophobic or misogynistic;
    1. He will undertake specific unconscious bias training at his own cost within six months of the date of the undertaking, and
    2. He will undertake specific diversity sensitivity training at his own cost within six months of the date of the undertaking, and
    3. He will provide evidence of completion of this training provided by an independent third party training provider within six months of the date of the undertaking to the CLSB.
  • He must inform any future employer of this outcome upon taking employment.
  • He will pay a financial penalty of £500.

In addition, the Costs Lawyer received a fixed costs order in the sum of £500.

Costs Lawyer Ryan Farnworth (CL1695)
Date 6 February 2026
Three disciplinary outcomes:

Summary of complaint received The Costs Lawyer may have breached Principles of the Costs Lawyer Code of Conduct.
Summary of outcome The investigation proved the allegation that the Costs Lawyer breached the following Principles:

  • Principle 1.1: The Costs Lawyer did not act with honesty and integrity.
  • Principle 1.3: The Costs Lawyer gave false or misleading information to those with whom he dealt.
  • Principle 1.7: The Costs Lawyer acted in a way which was likely to diminish the trust the public places in him or the profession of Costs Lawyers.

The Costs Lawyer provided a written undertaking to the CLSB:

  • That he will not at any time use his employer’s email address for his own or other private purposes;
  • That he will not at any time store personal or private information on any workspace provided by his employer;
  • That he will not engage in online gambling in any form using his employer’s computer or computer system or in his employer’s time;
  • That he will at all times comply with Data Protection legislation;
  • That in all respects he will uphold the Cost Lawyer’s Code of Conduct.

and received a fixed costs order of £500.

Costs Lawyer David Upton (CL925)
Date 20 January 2025
Summary of complaint received The findings of an SRA investigation suggested that the Costs Lawyer may have breached Principles of the Costs Lawyer Code of Conduct.

The Costs Lawyer failed to disclose the SRA investigation during the investigation or upon renewal of his practising certificate.

Summary of outcome In relation to the SRA findings:

  • The investigation proved the allegation that the Costs Lawyer breached Principle 1.7: You must not act in any way which is likely to diminish the trust the public places in you or in the profession of Costs Lawyers, and Principle 3.1: You must at all times act in the best interests of your client.

In relation to the failure to disclose:

  • The investigation proved the allegation that the Costs Lawyer beached Principle 5.1a: You must provide accurate and complete documentation and information on an application for a practising certificate and you must promptly notify the CLSB of any subsequent event that impacts on your fitness to be a Costs Lawyer.
  • Allegations in relation to Principles 5.2, 1.3 and 1.1 were not proved by the investigation.

In light of the sanction imposed by the SRA in relation to the underlying facts the CLSB decided that it was not appropriate to impose any additional separate sanction.

Costs Lawyer Andrew Thomas (CL618)
Date 13 January 2025
Summary of complaint received The Costs Lawyer failed to comply with the CLSB’s CPD audit procedures.
Summary of outcome The investigation proved the allegation that the Costs Lawyer breached Principle 5 of the Costs Lawyer Code of Conduct to “Deal with regulators and the Legal Ombudsman in an open and co-operative way:

5.1a       You must provide accurate and complete documentation and information on an application for a practising certificate and you must promptly notify the CLSB of any subsequent event that impacts on your fitness to be a Costs Lawyer.

5.1b       You must respond promptly to any requests from the CLSB with full and accurate information. You must provide the CLSB with access to information and documentation if requested to do so.”

The Costs Lawyer was issued a warning letter that they must at all times comply with the Costs Lawyers Code of Conduct and, in particular, ensure that they provide accurate and complete documentation and information when required by the Costs Lawyers Standards Board, and respond promptly to any requests from the Board.

In addition the Costs Lawyer received a fixed costs order of £500.

Costs Lawyer Jack Levin (CL525)
Date 17 April 2025
One disciplinary outcome in 2024 has been removed from publication on the CLSB website in accordance with our Policy on the Publication of Disciplinary Outcomes.

No disciplinary outcomes.

One disciplinary outcome in 2022 has been removed from publication on the CLSB website in accordance with our Policy on the Publication of Disciplinary Outcomes.

No disciplinary outcomes.

No disciplinary outcomes.

The one disciplinary outcome in 2019 has been removed from publication on the CLSB website in accordance with our Policy on the Publication of Disciplinary Outcomes.

Two disciplinary outcomes in 2018 have been removed from publication on the CLSB website in accordance with our Policy on the Publication of Disciplinary Outcomes.

No disciplinary outcomes.

No disciplinary outcomes.

No disciplinary outcomes.

The one disciplinary outcome in 2014 has been removed from publication on the CLSB website in accordance with our Policy on the Publication of Disciplinary Outcomes.

No disciplinary outcomes.

The two disciplinary outcomes in 2012 have been removed from publication on the CLSB website in accordance with our Policy on the Publication of Disciplinary Outcomes.

Interim suspension orders

An interim suspension order imposes a condition on the Costs Lawyer’s practising certificate that they do not have the right to practice as a Costs Lawyer while the interim suspension order has effect. An interim suspension order is considered following a complaint, and imposed if the CLSB is satisfied that not to do so would pose a risk to the public, and is in line with its regulatory objectives.

Record of current interim suspension orders

None currently in place.